The SpindleWorks Digital Christian Library
The SpindleWorks Digital Christian Library E-mail SpindleWorks Shopping Guide Search SpindleWorks SpindleWorks Home Page Sharing Reformed Christian Resources Around The World

"Notes" to THE CANONS OF DORT

Rev. C. Bouwman
Back to the "Notes" Table Of Contents
CHAPTER ONE   ARTICLES 16 - 18
Back to the "Notes" Table Of Contents

DIVINE ELECTION AND REPROBATION

ARTICLE 16

RESPONSES TO THE DOCTRINE OF REPROBATION

In the Articles 7-11, the fathers at the Synod of Dort made confession of God's one, unchangeable decree of election which is based on God's good pleasure. Articles 12 and 13 continued with an important confession concerning believers' assurance of election, stating that "the elect in due time ... are made certain of ... their eternal and unchangeable election to salvation". Believers attain this assurance by observing within themselves "with spiritual joy and holy delight ... true faith in Christ, a childlike fear of God, a godly sorrow for their sins, and a hungering and thirsting after righteousness." This assurance is most valuable to believers for it causes them to humble themselves before God, to adore God's mercy, to strive against sin and to love God fervently in response to the love He first showed them. In Article 15 the marvel of our election is pointed up by noting the fact that God has passed others by (reprobation), leaving them in their misery and subjected to His just judgment.

This mention of reprobation can leave one uncomfortable. Specifically, to mention God's eternal decree to pass some by can lead one to wonder whether perchance God has passed me by. That thought can lead to much unrest. For that reason, the fathers devoted an article to pastoral elements brought up by the mention of the doctrine of reprobation. In a pastoral manner they sought to reach out to people, offering guidance in how they should digest their doubts and questions concerning their growth in faith and their election.

Article 16 speaks of three different responses to the doctrine of reprobation:

  1. those who do not clearly discern within themselves the fruits of election;
  2. those who cannot reach the degree of godliness and faith they desire and strive for;
  3. those who disregard God and live in sin.

RESPONSE 1

RESPONSE 2

RESPONSE 3

ARTICLE 17

CHILDREN OF BELIEVERS WHO DIE IN INFANCY

Article 16 dealt with the pastoral problem of how mature believers respond to the doctrine of reprobation. Our fathers also saw need to devote attention to the matter of whether children of believers are saved if they die in infancy. That there was a need to address the issue is demonstrated by the relatively high infant mortality rates prevalent at the time of the Synod of Dort in 1618-1619. Though the infant mortality rate in our society today is very low, we today too want to know where our children go if they die in infancy.

The Arminians had said that God elects to salvation on the basis of foreseen faith, and destines others to hell on the basis of foreseen unbelief. Infants, however, neither believe nor dis-believe; they are too young to choose the one or the other. God, then, said the Arminians, merciful as He is, grants salvation to all children who die. Infants, then, are saved 'automatically', but the destiny of adults is determined by their own choice of whether to believe or not believe.

The fathers turned to Scripture in order to find what out the Lord says concerning the position of children. Scripture speaks of the whole human race having fallen into sin when Adam sinned, and so the whole human race joined Satan's side. Paul in Romans 5:12 makes reference to the fall into sin of Genesis 3 when he states, "therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned". This text insists that when Adam sinned, I sinned; we all sinned. If I fell with Adam -as this text insists- then my children also fell with Adam. In a way we cannot understand, the entire human race sinned with Adam. So the entire human race is guilty before God. This is true of the adults of any given generation, and is equally true of the children of any given generation. So the anger of the Lord rests upon all men, irrespective of age or talent or tribe or location on the globe.

THE LORD DISCRIMINATES BETWEEN CHILDREN

All children, then, are by nature children of wrath. Can we believe that any are saved, and if so, on what basis? The fathers at the Synod of Dort understood from Scripture that the Lord discriminates between children, treating the one child differently than another. The Lord makes a distinction between the children of believers on the one hand and the children of unbelievers on the other. The children of believers belong to God; the children of unbelievers do not. Our fathers concluded this on the basis of God's Word as we read it in Genesis 17:7. There the Lord says to Abraham, "And I will establish My covenant between Me and you and your descendants after you in their generations, for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and your descendants after you." Whatever God said in this passage concerning Abraham, God said equally concerning Abraham's offspring. God promised to be Abraham's God; He equally promised to be God to Abraham's children. That is the thrust of the words: "and your descendants after you". So God viewed Abraham's children differently than He viewed the children of Abraham's neighbour. That is to say: God discriminated between these children. Those of the one family He claimed for Himself; those of the other family He did not.

In Acts 2 we read Peter's Pentecost sermon, preached to an audience of Jews who had come together in Jerusalem to celebrate the Feast of Weeks. In verse 22 we read that he addressed a specific group of people, namely, "Men of Israel", i.e., God's covenant people. To them specifically Peter says in verse 39, "For the promise is to you and to your children, and to all who are far off, as many as the Lord our God will call." The promise was not to the children of the Greeks or the children of the Egyptians, but to the children of the Israelites: "and to your children."

Paul says to the Corinthians in 1 Corinthians 7:14, "For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband; otherwise your children would be unclean, but now they are holy." The fact that they are children of a believing parent makes these children special to God; they are holy, says the apostle.

On the other hand, the children of unbelievers are "unclean" (I Corinthians 7:14). That these children do not belong to God is pointed up in Paul's word to the saints at Ephesus. Paul reminds these saints of who they once were before the Holy Spirit had renewed them. "Therefore remember that you, once Gentiles in the flesh - who are called Uncircumcision by what is called the Circumcision made in the flesh by hands - …were without Christ, aliens from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world" (Ephesians 2:11f). In their childhood, then, these Ephesian saints were not God's people, were "strangers from the covenants of promise". But later in life the Lord gave them faith and from then on they (and therefore their children too, see Genesis 17:7; see also Acts 11:14, 16:15,29ff, 18:8) were "no longer strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God" (verse 19).

God, then, discriminates between the children of believers and the children of unbelievers. God has established His covenant with believers and the children He gives to believers; these children He claims for Himself. The children of my unbelieving neighbour do not belong to God and so his children are unclean.

BELIEVERS OUGHT NOT TO DOUBT THE ELECTION OF CHILDREN WHO DIE IN INFANCY

On the basis of the above texts from Scripture, our fathers concluded that God claims for Himself the children of believing parents. Therefore they wrote in Article 17 that the Word of God "declares that the children of believers are holy, not by nature but in virtue of the covenant of grace, in which they are included with their parents." Therefore if a child of believing parents dies, the parents, on the authority of what the Bible says, may believe that God's promises are fulfilled for their child. "Therefore, God-fearing parents ought not to doubt the election and salvation of their children whom God calls out of this life in their infancy."

Believing parents are excited by the rich promises God bestows on their children, as signified and sealed in the sacrament of Baptism. Since God has revealed Himself in His Word to be ever faithful, is it possible that He would cause the same parents to be left with comfortless doubts as to the eternal destiny of a child of theirs which dies in infancy?! If God is faithful this cannot be so. By baptism God seals His promises to be Father to the child "and promises to provide (the child) with all good and avert all evil or turn it to (the child's) benefit." The child is also promised forgiveness of sins through the blood of God the Son and regeneration by God the Holy Spirit. Shall God then turn a sickness or an accident into the catalyst that places the child eternally in hell?! Is this the God we have?? No, God's promises to a child of believing parents are not empty promises. God is always true to His Word.

It is faith in this very promise of God which comforted David at the death of the child that was born to him and Bathsheba after their sin of adultery. On hearing that the baby died, "David arose from the ground, washed and anointed himself, and changed his clothes; and he went into the house of the LORD and worshipped. Then he went into his own house; and when he requested, they set food before him, and he ate. Then his servants said to him, "What is this that you have done? You fasted and wept for the child while he was alive, but when the child died, you arose and ate food." And he said, "While the child was alive, I fasted and wept; for I said, "Who can tell whether the LORD will be gracious to me, that the child may live? But now he is dead; why should I fast? Can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he shall not return to me" (2 Samuel 12:20-23). When a child of ours dies, we give ourselves to grief. David, however, responded to death by breaking his fast. In so doing, David expressed his conviction that God had taken his child to Himself. In other words, David did not grieve as one who had no hope. Further, that David was sure that God had taken the child to Himself is evident from David's words: "I shall go to him, but he shall not return to me" (verse 23). Where shall David go? David is a believer and he knows that at his death he shall go to be with the Lord; to where the Lord has taken his child ahead of him.

The children of believers belong to God. That is as true before birth as after their birth. Also through the womb the Lord gathers His Church. The child which dies of cot death is the Lord's, and so is the child which is still-born or the child which dies after three months of development in the womb. This knowledge contains a definite and very rich comfort for God-fearing parents.

ARTICLE 18

NO PROTEST BUT ADORATION

In reaction to those who mock what is so clearly taught by Scripture, our fathers wrote this last article. It is the Lord Himself who teaches election and reprobation in His Word and therefore we confess in Article 18, "To those who argue against this grace of undeserved election and the severity of righteous reprobation, we reply with this word of the apostle: But who are you, a man, to answer back to God?" In other words, "who do you think you are?" The only truthful answer with which I can reply is, "I am but a man, and a sinful one at that".

Here I confess that the first fitting response on my part to what the Lord has revealed concerning election and reprobation is deep humility before God. Job, having contested before God the loss of his children, his possessions, his health, finds himself challenged by God. Said God to Job, "Shall the one who contends with the Almighty correct Him? He who rebukes God, let him answer it." Job's response was this: "Behold, I am vile; what shall I answer You? I lay my hand over my mouth. Once I have spoken, but I will not answer; yes, twice, but I will proceed no further" (Job 40:2-5). This is equally the attitude I am to assume before God in view of the doctrine of election and reprobation: humility. If it has pleased the Lord to save some and leave others, am I allowed to complain? No. As Paul said: "But indeed, O man, who are you to reply against God?" (see Romans 9:20ff). Humble I must be, and from that must flow praise and adoration for the Lord. "Lord, that You should choose people for Yourself , even me, is more than I fathom. What a God You are!" To say it with the words of the apostle as we read it in Romans 11:33-36, "O the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and how inscrutable His ways! For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been His counsel? Or who has given a gift to Him that He might be repaid? For from Him and through Him and to Him are all things. To Him be glory for ever. Amen".



Back to the "Notes" Table Of Contents

 

This is a SpindleWorks page